Author: Chih-Wei Chang, Kristin A Higgins, Xiaojun Jiang, Pretesh Patel, Justin R. Roper, Keyur Shah, Sibo Tian, Zhen Tian, Yinan Wang, Xiaofeng Yang, Jun Zhou 👨🔬
Affiliation: Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Cancer Center Atlanta, Emory University, University of Chicago, Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University 🌍
Purpose: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a life-threatening arrhythmia commonly treated with catheter ablation; however, some cases remain refractory to conventional treatment. Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) has emerged as a non-invasive option for such patients. While photon-based STAR has shown efficacy, proton therapy offers potential advantages due to its superior dose conformity and sparing of critical organs at risk (OARs), including the heart itself. This study aims to investigate and compare the dosimetry between proton and photon therapy for VT, focusing on target coverage and OAR sparing.
Methods: We performed a retrospective study on a cohort of 30 VT patients who received photon STAR. Proton STAR plans were generated using robust optimization in RayStation to deliver the same prescription dose of 25 Gy in a single fraction while minimizing dose to OARs. Dosimetric metrics, including D99, D95, Dmean, and D0.03cc, were extracted for critical OARs (heart, lungs, esophagus) and ventricular arrhythmogenic substrates (VAS). Shapiro-Wilk tests were used to assess normality, followed by paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for statistical comparisons between modalities, with Benjamini-Hochberg correction applied for multiple comparisons.
Results: Proton and photon plans achieved comparable target coverage, with VAS D99 of 22.9 ± 3.0 Gy vs. 22.7 ± 2.4 Gy (p=0.156). Proton therapy significantly reduced OAR doses, including heart Dmean (3.8 ± 1.6 Gy vs. 5.4 ± 2.0 Gy, p<0.001), lungs Dmean (0.7 ± 0.6 Gy vs. 1.2 ± 0.7 Gy, p<0.001), and esophagus Dmean (0.2 ± 0.5 Gy vs. 1.5 ± 1.2 Gy, p<0.001), while maintaining optimal target coverage.
Conclusion: Proton therapy for STAR demonstrates significant dosimetric advantages in sparing the heart and other critical OARs compared to photon therapy for VT, while maintaining equivalent target coverage. These findings highlight the potential of proton therapy to reduce treatment-related toxicity and improve outcomes for VT patients.