0.23T/1.5T MRI Imaging for Spine with Instrumentations 📝

Author: Soon N. Huh, Perry B. Johnson, Jiyeon Park, Ryan Stevens 👨‍🔬

Affiliation: University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, UF Health Proton Therapy Institute, UFHPTI 🌍

Abstract:

Purpose:
MRI images with minimal artefacts to scan spine with Titanium instrumentation (screws, stabilizing rods, and spacer) are acquired by optimizing scanning parameters of pulse sequences (mainly B-FFE 3D) of 0.23T MRI Panorama MR Scanner and 1.5T MR Philips Ingenia MR Scanner to visualize spinal cord, spinal canal, recurrent/residual tumors, and anatomical changes, such as fluid accumulations.
Methods:
A house-made phantom, consisting of a boney ox tail, titanium screws, and bolus submerged in a water container was used to optimize various pulse sequences of 0.23T and 1.5T MRI. (1) For 0.23T: The balanced fast field echo 3D (b-FFE 3D in Philips MR scanner, Panorama MR scanner was mainly used for photon and proton planning, (2) for 1.5T MRI, two pulses sequences were optimized with another house-made phantom to acquire MRI Images with minimal artifacts.
Results:
(1) For 0.23T MRI, the B-FFE 3D pulse sequences are used to scan 3 orthogonal planes. It has been used to acquire MR images for spinal cord, canal, recurrent/residual tumors, fluid accumulation around surgical regions, and previously irradiated treatment region if Re-RT is used are visible as MR-based dosimetry.
(2) For 1.5T, MRI with minimal artifacts were acquired with the optimized pulse sequences such as VAT, and SEMAC using a house made phantom, and artifact-free MR images were acquired.
Conclusion:
Over the last decade, 0.23T MRI and CT Myelogram are compared side-by-side to delineate cord/canal, and also can be used to monitor tumor progression as MR-based surveillance throughout treatment. MRI has been used to define contours of targets, such as sarcoma, chordoma, spinal mets, and OARs, when diagnostic MRI is not clinically useful.

Back to List